March 21, 2007

(What follows is the first in a series of posts regarding my reading of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf.)

Though the second half of the twentieth century discredited the political theories presented in Mein Kampf and left them to the outer fringes of society, the book’s importance cannot be understated: after all, this is the book that started a world war, a book that, by its very mention, can make people uncomfortable. It’s impossible to approach Mein Kampf without some preconceived ideas of what it contains: with over six million Jews, as well as others whom Hitler deemed “undesirable,” left dead in its wake, the book is rightly the most notorious political tract of the last century, filled with hyperbole, hatred, and anger. Inevitably, the question arises: why read Mein Kampf at all?

I’ve been struggling with this question since starting the book. Obviously, Mein Kampf isn’t a book one reads for enjoyment (and, to be sure, its style—dense, tiresome, and grossly overwritten—as well as its reputation, makes any sort of enjoyment impossible). And though one could make the case that Hitler is giving himself the kind of importance he didn’t deserve when the book was written—he wrote the first half of Mein Kampf while in prison and the second half before entering German politics—the book is more than a narcissist’s wet dream. Here, Hitler lays out his political theories with startling clarity and foresight, revealing himself as a man who literally believed everything he wrote, who announced his intentions for Germany long before he became chancellor. The book was largely ignored prior to World War II, but therein lies its importance: its dismissal carried disastrous and tragic consequences. As Elie Wiesel once wrote, “Not being a professional historian, I take on this essay with fear and trembling. That’s because, although defeated, although dead, this man is frightening.”

Chapter I: In the Home of My Parents

From the first page of Mein Kampf, Hitler makes his intentions quite clear, with the second paragraph amounting to a declaration of war:

People of the same blood should be in the same Reich. The German people have no right to engage in a colonial policy until they shall have brought all their children together in one State. When the territory of the Reich embraces all the Germans and finds itself unable to assure them a livelihood, only then can the moral right arise, from the need of the people to acquire foreign territory. The plough is then the sword; and the tears of war will produce the daily bread for the generations to come.

The first chapter of Mein Kampf is largely an examination of Hitler’s youth, but there’s a formula here: he doesn’t offer much in the way of what his childhood was like (though he mentions “juvenile disputes” with his father and says his ”oratorical skills” came from singing in the church choir); instead, self-examination—the hallmark of any autobiography—is used to give insight into how his intense nationalism began to form. He describes how he discovered his father’s books on the Franco-German War of 1870-71: “And from that time onwards I became more and more enthusiastic about everything that was in any way connected with war or military affairs.” At the age of eleven, Hitler rejected the idea of becoming a civil servant, citing a “profound hatred” for the Austrian state and, in particular, the Habsburg Empire, which he accuses of showing favoritism towards Czechs and allowing the “poison of foreign races” to dilute the blood of the German people.

Hitler makes little mention of his mother and relegates her death to one (almost dismissive) paragraph at the end of the chapter. This is striking, since some historians and teachers (and, in particular, the documentary Portrait of a Tyrant) have long contended that he blamed a Jewish doctor for her death, with this blame ultimately blossoming into the Holocaust. But, as chapter two reveals, this may be an oversimplification of Hitler’s anti-Semitism; the “mother” explanation ignores his burgeoning political convictions, which start taking shape upon his arrival in Vienna, Austria.

Entry Filed under: Books. .

7 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Lesley  |  March 22, 2007 at 6:14 am

    I can understand the appeal of reading this book, getting inside the mind (at least what he chooses to share) of a man who was one of the major influences of the 20th century. I agree with you that ascribing his anti-Semitism to any one cause is an oversimplification – so many factors contributed to his hatred.

    Reply
  • 2. Andi  |  March 22, 2007 at 6:28 am

    I’m with Lesley..I can understand the desire to read the book. I’ve often almost picked it up myself, the size being more of a deterrant than anything else.

    I enjoyed this first installment and look forward to more!

    Reply
  • 3. Brandon  |  March 22, 2007 at 8:50 am

    Lesley: I first attempted “Mein Kampf” in high school, but I just couldn’t get past the first few pages–that’s how dense it is. And, after reading it for about a week or so, I’m only seventy pages into it; I can’t handle more than a few pages a night. The book is suffocating, but I do think it’s essential reading, especially if one wants to gain deeper insight into how the Holocaust came about. And Elie Wiesel hit the nail on the head: Hitler is frightening, and “Mein Kampf” is leaving me feeling dirty. It’s like reading pure evil.

    Andi: I agree, its size can be off-putting; reading over six hundred pages of racism, political garbage, and propaganda is enough to wear anyone down. And I was almost afraid to post on the book; “Mein Kampf” has such strong connotations, even for those who haven’t read it, that I almost disabled comments for these posts. I just don’t want my blog becoming a dumping ground, but then I thought, “Well, I’m sure (I hope) most people are mature enough to discuss it.” But I’ve found myself choosing my words very carefully.

    Reply
  • 4. LK  |  March 22, 2007 at 1:58 pm

    From a historical perspective, the book is important. But not as a piece of literature.

    Reply
  • 5. Dorothy W.  |  March 22, 2007 at 3:17 pm

    I’m interested in this series of posts too; I doubt I’ll ever read Mein Kampf, so I’m curious to hear what you have to say about it. It does sound like a fascinating, although very troubling read.

    Reply
  • 6. Brandon  |  March 22, 2007 at 10:18 pm

    LK: I agree. The book is garbage and only interesting insofar as it gives a little more insight into Hitler’s political mindset.

    Dorothy: I’m ambivalent about recommending the book. Is it necessary? I think so, since it serves as a reminder about the Holocaust. But I wouldn’t recommend it to everyone, since the book is so tiresome; anyone tackling it better be ready for a long, dull ride. Then again, when you compare “Mein Kampf” to Iran’s president, who said that he wants to “wipe Israel off the map,” you wonder how far we should take it–was he just trying to piss everyone off with that remark, or is he serious about it? It’s sort of the same idea with “Mein Kampf”; few people took Hitler seriously when the book was published and, well, we know how things turned out. So we always watch guys like Ahmadinejad, to be on our toes and look at them with mistrust.

    Reply
  • 7. fade theory » reading evil  |  March 30, 2007 at 4:41 am

    [...] over at The After-Dinner Payback is reading Mein Kampf. Apparently, aside from the disturbing subject matter, it’s also poorly [...]

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Contact

Subscribe

 

March 2007
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Archives