March 19, 2007
Science fiction: too nerdy for its own good?
You see, when it comes to the genre wars, science fiction is at a very curious disadvantage. As soon as someone writes a really good sci-fi book it nearly always seems to get reclassified as something else. It’s a bit like the way members of the Ireland cricket team become English once they reach a certain level.
To see what I mean, try drawing up a list of the best sci-fi authors. If it’s anything like mine when I started thinking about this subject, it will be topped off by names like Isaac Asimov, Arthur C. Clarke, and Philip K. Dick. There’s nothing wrong with any of those writers, of course, no matter what Philip K. Dick himself may say to the contrary. Often they are profoundly interesting. However—and here’s the catch—they’re not half as impressive as the authors on the second list I drew up: Kurt Vonnegut, Angela Carter, J. G. Ballard, and Thomas Pynchon.
The thing here is that it took a real shift in thinking to include the latter four writers as sci-fi. Their books all include strong elements of science fiction. There are parallel universes, time shifts, robots, people with names like Zog, Zoyd, Brock Vond, and Dr. Hoffman. There are strange machines and philosophical musings on the nature of reality.
Even so, my first instinct would be to give them some other label, as if their beautiful prose alone has made them transcend the genre.
I think a lot of serious readers often struggle with “overcoming” genre hurdles—I happen to be one of them. For years, I’d dismissed science fiction as “geek lit,” sneering at any novel depicting a planet, alien, or spaceship on the cover. But over the last year or so, my respect for the genre has grown considerably: I loved Kurt Vonnegut’s Cat’s Cradle (it’s one of the funniest and oddest books I’ve ever read) and, in rediscovering Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and the fiction of H. G. Wells, I’ve realized that science fiction, far from being a haven for Star Wars nerds, can actually be more fun and thought-provoking than literary fiction. And why shouldn’t it be? Perhaps more than any other genre, science fiction is in a prime position to make us think while inspiring awe and wonder in its nearly-limitless scope.
7 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
Nonanon | March 19, 2007 at 6:04 pm
I must admit, I’ve never really understood this hurdle. Does anyone actually look at what anyone else is reading? And care? I guess I figure so few people read that if anyone’s holding onto a book of any kind I like them. Oh, with the exception of Marley and Me or anything by Sue Monk Kidd.
Oh wait, I guess I get the hurdle.
2.
Brandon | March 19, 2007 at 10:21 pm
Nonanon: I do think some readers–especially literary-minded readers–can be quick to dismiss a book simply because it’s genre fiction. But even genres can be wide-ranging. When I checked out “Gravity’s Rainbow,” I was surprised to see a “science fiction” sticker on it. (Reading it, however, is another matter, as I wasn’t able to wade through more than ten pages of it before thinking, “What a waste of trees.”) But think about it. Who do you think would make the more interesting conversationalist: the guy reading Robert H. Heinlein, or the guy reading Orhan Pamuk?
3.
Nonanon | March 20, 2007 at 6:39 am
Well, Brandon, it’s not a fair question if you’re going to use Robert Heinlein as your SF example, although I grok what you’re saying.
4.
Danielle | March 20, 2007 at 7:10 pm
Although I really don’t read sci-fi (I might like some of it, if I gave it a try), I have never had anything against anyone who does read “genre” books. I do like mysteries, though, another genre, so since I am part of one of those groups maybe that is why.
5.
Brandon | March 21, 2007 at 9:49 pm
Nonanon: “Stranger in a Strange Land,” right? I’ve never read that one. “Starship Troopers,” yes. And I had to puzzle over who to use as an example. I almost mentioned Stanislaw Lem, if only to sound literary, but sadly, I haven’t read him. Yet.
Danielle: I don’t have a problem with genre fiction either, but I don’t make a conscious effort to read a particular genre. And I’m sure you would like some sci-fi, but your reading tastes are so wide-ranging that making a suggestion seems futile. (Didn’t you and the Slaves read “The Island of Dr. Moreau”? That’s sci-fi.) Then again, you seem like someone who’s never met a book she didn’t like…
6.
Lesley | March 22, 2007 at 6:21 am
I’m not much of a reader of sci-fi, but I agree that this genre has some of the most provocative literature. One of my favorite sci-fi writers is Octavia Butler.
My personal genre hurdle is fantasy – I tend to completely avoid books with that label, particularly anything with wizards, dragons or elves.
7.
Brandon | March 22, 2007 at 8:54 am
Lesley: I usually avoid fantasy as well, especially of the Conan or Tolkien variety, but I like some of it. I just finished Susanna Clarke’s “The Ladies of Grace Adieu” (Clarke wrote “Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell”) and I loved it.